DESABETINO v. BIAGINI et al
RICHARD DESABETINO |
SEAN BIAGINI, MICHAEL SNIDER, JOHN SYMSEK and WILLIAM KELLY |
2:2016cv00341 |
March 24, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Cynthia Reed Eddy |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 119 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, the Court will grant each of the Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 99, 102, and 106) as to all claims. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 6/24/2020. (mrm) |
Filing 39 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying Officer Kelly's 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and denying as moot Plaintiff's 38 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 9/12/2016. (bap) |
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 25 , 30 Motions to Appoint Counsel, and denying Plaintiff's 27 , 28 Motions for Default Judgment against Defendant Kelly. The Court's Order from 8/9/2016 requiring Plainti ff to respond to Defendant Kelly's motion to dismiss on or before 9/21/2016 remains in place. Plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to this motion will result in the motion being decided without the benefit of his response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 8/23/2016. (bap) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.