BAUGH v. ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY

BAUGH v. ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY

Plaintiff:	JEANNE BAUGH
Defendant:	ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY
Case Number:	2:2016cv00430
Filed:	April 13, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Fayette
Presiding Judge:	Joy Flowers Conti
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2018	Filing 65 ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 35 Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY as follows: 1) Judgment is granted in favor of RMU with respect to the claims set forth in Counts I and II of the plainti ff's first amended complaint for sex discrimination in violation of Title VII, Title IX, and the PHRA, to the extent the claims are based upon the fall 2013 semester INFS6151 course assignment and the summer 2014 session ethics course assignment ; 2) Judgment is granted in favor of RMU with respect to the claim set forth in Count III of the plaintiff's first amended complaint for retaliation in violation of Title IX; 3) Judgment is granted in favor of RMU with respect to the claims set forth in Counts V and VI of the plaintiff's first amended complaint for hostile work environment in violation of Title VII, Title IX, and the PHRA; and 4) the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendant RMU is denied in all other respects. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 03/20/2018. (bfm)
August 25, 2017	Filing 61 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 46 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/25/17. (bfm)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2018

Filing 65 ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 35 Motion for Summary Judgment filed on behalf of ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY as follows: 1) Judgment is granted in favor of RMU with respect to the claims set forth in Counts I and II of the plainti ff's first amended complaint for sex discrimination in violation of Title VII, Title IX, and the PHRA, to the extent the claims are based upon the fall 2013 semester INFS6151 course assignment and the summer 2014 session ethics course assignment ; 2) Judgment is granted in favor of RMU with respect to the claim set forth in Count III of the plaintiff's first amended complaint for retaliation in violation of Title IX; 3) Judgment is granted in favor of RMU with respect to the claims set forth in Counts V and VI of the plaintiff's first amended complaint for hostile work environment in violation of Title VII, Title IX, and the PHRA; and 4) the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendant RMU is denied in all other respects. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 03/20/2018. (bfm)

August 25, 2017

Filing 61 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 46 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/25/17. (bfm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAUGH v. ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEANNE BAUGH
Represented By:	Martell Harris
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?