MCCULLOUGH v. THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY PENNSYLVANIA et al
| KATHLEEN MCCULLOUGH |
| THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY PENNSYLVANIA, RICH FITZGERALD, DAN ONORATO, JOSEPH TODD MOSES, PNC FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REA MILLER, THOMAS GRAY and LANA BOEHM |
| 2:2016cv00534 |
| April 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Washington |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
Memorandum & Order. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum & Order filed herewith, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 62, 64, 71, 73, and 77) are GRANTED. Consistent with the foregoing, the Court hereby DISMISSES this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 2/16/2017. (kg)
|
|
Filing
99
MEMORANDUM ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 85 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 12/7/2016. (kg)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Counsel (Doc. 33 ) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/13/16. (rld) Staff Notes: A copy of the Memorandum Order has been mailed to Plaintiff at her address of record via First Class U.S. Mail.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
