SAUNDERS v. GFS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC et al
| RAYCO SAUNDERS |
| GFS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, DC BOXING AND WRESTLING COMMISSION, SHELDON J. BROWN, DARRYL ROBINSON, JAMES SMITH and DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS |
| 2:2016cv01062 |
| July 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER adopting 64 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment against GFS Entertainment Group, LLC and James Smith (Doc. 62 ) is GRANTED only with respect to GFS and for the amount of $5,001 and otherwise denied ; Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment against Darryl Robinson (Doc. 49 ) is DENIED; and the R&R is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the District Court. To the extent Defendant has specific costs related to bringing this action against GFS, he is directed to 28 U.S.C. §1924.. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/18/2020. (scl)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM ORDER. For the reasons stated in the filing at this docket entry, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56 ) is REJECTED; the Court's January 15, 2019 Memorandum Order (Doc. 46 ) is VACATED to the extent it dismissed GFS Entertainment Group, LLC from this lawsuit and MODIFIED to reflect that GFS Entertainment Group, LLC was properly served; and GFS Entertainment Group, LLC is REINSTATED as a party. This matter is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings consistent with this order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 7/30/19. (rdl)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM ORDER. As the Amended Complaint (Doc. 39 ) fails to assert a claim for relief against Defendant Dotson, or to assert any facts showing Defendant Dotson's role in the events giving rise to Plaintiff's claims, this action must be dismissed against Defendant Dotson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court DISMISSES this action as to Defendant Dotson, with prejudice. See contents of this filing. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 1/15/19. (rdl)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER denying 32 Motion for Reconsideration. See contents of this filing. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 8/29/18. (rdl)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting in part and rejecting in part 29 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Order filed herewith, the Court dismisses the following claims with prejudice: Count 1, in part, Plaintiff's breach of contrac t claims against Defendants Robinson, Smith, Brown, DCBWC and DCRA; Count 2, Plaintiff's violation of fiduciary duty claims against Defendants Brown, DCBWC and DCRA; Count 3, in part, Plaintiff's tortious interference with contract claims a gainst Defendants GFS, Brown, DCBWC and DCRA; Count 4, Plaintiff's unjust enrichment claims against Defendants Robinson, Smith, GFS, Brown, DCBWC and DCRA; Count 5, Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defen dants Brown, DCBWC and DCRA; Count 6, Plaintiff's negligence claims against Defendants Brown, DCBWC and DCRA. In addition, the Court dismisses the following claims without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a second amended complaint: Count 3, in par t, Plaintiff's tortious interference with contract claims against Defendants Robinson and Smith. Plaintiff's remaining claim is allowed to proceed: Count 1, in part, Plaintiff's breach of contract claim against Defendant GFS. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 11/28/17. (rdl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
