MATHEWS v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS
Plaintiff: KUZHIKALAYIH MATHEWS
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS
Case Number: 2:2016cv01148
Filed: July 29, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Schwab
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM re 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS. Signed by Judge Mark A. Kearney on 4/13/2017. (kly)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MATHEWS v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KUZHIKALAYIH MATHEWS
Represented By: Rolf Louis Patberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH PHYSICIANS
Represented By: John J. Myers
Represented By: William S. Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?