JOHNSON v. JOHNSONM et al
| ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON |
| B. J. JOHNSONM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2016cv01250 |
| August 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER denying 37 Petitioner's Motion for Discovery that was renewed at 50 the hearing held on June 16, 2020; dismissing for lack of jurisdiction, and, in the alternative, dismissing as untimely 6 the Petition for Wri t of Habeas Corpus; and denying a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of Court is ordered to mark this case CLOSED. Petitioner has thirty (30) days in which to file a notice of appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on November 23, 2020. (kcb)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER dismissing 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is to mark this case Closed. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner has thirty (30) days in which to file a notice of appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on January 22, 2018. (kcc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
