MADER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
| MADER and MARGARET MADER |
| LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA |
| 2:2016cv01288 |
| August 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Arthur J Schwab |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER APPROVING #8 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by MARGARET MADER. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 12/5/16. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (lck)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal by MARGARET MADER. (Bronson, Brian) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER it appearing to the Court that the parties have agreed to an amicable resolution of this matter, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove this case from the docket for administrative purposes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that, in the event either party fails to execute the settlement agreement, the case shall be reinstated to the docket upon written request of either party for purposes of enforcement of the settlement agreement. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement of the parties. Clerk is to mark CASE CLOSED. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of Court or notice on the matter. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/28/16. (ms)
|
| Filing 6 Disclosure Statement identifying LINA is a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of Connecticut General Corporation, which is a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of Cigna Holdings, Inc., which is a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of Cigna Corporation, a publicly traded company, as corporate parent or other affiliate, by LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. (Riggs, Christina) |
| Filing 5 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint With Affirmative Defenses by LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. (Riggs, Christina) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER SETTING Initial Case Management Conference for 12/5/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7C before Judge Arthur J. Schwab. 26(f) Report, Proposed Case Management Order, and ADR Stipulation are due on 11/28/16. Defendant's Answer is due on October 24, 2016. Counsel for Plaintiff is hereby directed to immediately serve the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference together with the Complaint upon Defendant or Counsel for Defendant. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 9/16/16. (lck)
|
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MARGARET MADER. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA waiver sent on 8/24/2016, answer due 10/24/2016. (Bronson, Brian) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (ms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4062546), filed by MARGARET MADER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ksa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
