FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC.
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant: INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC.
Case Number: 2:2016cv01669
Filed: November 3, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 231 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 224 MOTION for Judgment on Partial Findings filed by INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC. For the reasons stated in the opinion judgment will be entered in favor of Innovative Designs and against the FTC. An appropriate Judgment Order will follow. Details more fully stated in the opinion. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/24/20. (cjo)
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 218 MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC.'s Motion to Strike 196 and 207 is granted. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/14/20. (jg)
July 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER indicating that Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Andy Lindus and Preclude Supplementation of Dr. Garlottas Opinion filed by Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission 165 is denied, in part, and granted, in part, and Defe ndant may call Andy Lindus as a lay witness on rebuttal. Lindus may provide fact testimony only and may not be used as an expert or quasi-expert. The remainder of the motion will be ruled upon after argument at the Pretrial Conference on 7/23/19, i.e., the requested supplementation of Dr. Garlotta's opinion (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/17/19. (jg)
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 160 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 133 Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Defendant's Proffered Expert Dr. Donald Garlotta (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 4/30/19. (jg)
July 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 110 MEMORANDUM OPINION 99 Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Sur-rebuttal Expert Report; An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/26/18. (jg)
March 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, IDI's motion to disqualify the FTC's expert 65 was appropriately denied by the Court on 2/21/18 87 . IDI's sealed motion for protective order to designate information as confidential material 86 is likewise denied. An appropriate Order regarding the latter motion follows, the Court having already entered an Order denying the former. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/15/18. (jg)
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that that, for good cause shown and given the equities outlined above, Defendant's Motion to Extend the Discovery Deadline 44 is granted, in part, and denied, in part. Fact discovery is hereby extended until 11/3/ 17; that the Court will hold a Telephonic Status Conference with the parties on 10/2/17 at 4:30 p.m.; that the Court will hold a Telephonic Post Fact Discovery Status Conference on 11/20/17 at 4:00 p.m., at which time the Court will hear from the parties on, inter alia, their remaining needs relating to expert discovery, and will set an expert discovery schedule. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/28/17. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Represented By: Omolara Bewaji Joseney
Represented By: Alejandro G. Rosenberg(Designation US Govt Atty)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC.
Represented By: Anthony E. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?