BANKS v. HORNAK et al
| FREDERICK BANKS |
| MARK HORNAK, ORLANDO HARPER, DAVID HICTON, CATHY BISSOON, ROBERT CESSAR, SEAN LANGFORD, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD, U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE, JOHN BRENNAN and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY |
| 2:2016mc00079 |
| January 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER re 11 MOTION to Vacate 2 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, 8 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct, Order on Motion to Vacate, Order on Motion for Disclosure, 10 Order filed by FREDERICK BANKS. For the reasons indicated in the accompanying memorandum opinion. The motion is denied and the clerk is directed to mark this case closed. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/22/2018. (msp)
|
|
Filing
9
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION re 7 Memorandum Opinion. Memorandum Opinion at (ECF No. 7 ) amended to reflect proper caption. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/28/2016. (bgm)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 3 MOTION for reconsideration filed by FREDERICK BANKS. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, Banks's motion for reconsideration will be denied. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 2/22/2016. (bgm) Modified on 2/22/2016. (bgm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
