MCKAVENEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Western District MCKAVENEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

MCKAVENEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

Petitioner:	KIMBERLY S. MCKAVENEY
Respondent:	COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number:	2:2017cv00670
Filed:	May 23, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Pittsburgh Office
County:	Lycoming
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Mitchell
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 25, 2017	Filing 5 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 4 as the opinion of this Court; that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner 1 is dismissed as untimely and, because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exist s, a certificate of appealability is denied.; that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order she must do so within 30 days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/25/17. (jg)
May 25, 2017	Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by KIMBERLY S. MCKAVENEY requiring the petitioner to show cause, if any, why the petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 05/25/2015. (Mitchell, Robert)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 25, 2017

Filing 5 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 4 as the opinion of this Court; that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner 1 is dismissed as untimely and, because reasonable jurists could not conclude that a basis for appeal exist s, a certificate of appealability is denied.; that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure if the petitioner desires to appeal from this Order she must do so within 30 days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 7/25/17. (jg)

May 25, 2017

Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by KIMBERLY S. MCKAVENEY requiring the petitioner to show cause, if any, why the petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 05/25/2015. (Mitchell, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MCKAVENEY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: KIMBERLY S. MCKAVENEY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?