MAZUR v. SOUTHWESTERN VETERANS CENTER et al
| MARGARET MAZUR |
| SOUTHWESTERN VETERANS CENTER and DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS |
| 2:2017cv00826 |
| June 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Butler |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
OPINION setting forth the reasons the motion for summary judgment 121 filed by Mazur will be DENIED; the motion to compel name-clearing hearing 159 will be DENIED AS MOOT; and the motion for summary judgment by defendants 126 will be GRANTED. An appropriate order and judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/12/2019. (kjm)
|
|
Filing
156
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW setting forth the reasons the MOTION for Sanctions 112 will be granted in part and denied in part. An appropriate order will be entered. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/7/2019. (kjm)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER DENYING the motion for leave to file a second amended complaint 110 for the reasons set forth in the accompanying MEMORANDUM OPINION 117 . Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/30/2018. (ahm)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER re 43 MOTION TO DISMISS filed by SOUTHWESTERN VETERANS CENTER AND DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AND VETERANS AFFAIRS. For the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum opinion, it is ordered that the partial motion to dismiss the plaintiff� 39;s amended complaint filed by the defendants Southwestern Veterans Center and Department of Military and Veterans Affairs is GRANTED to the extent that the motion seeks the dismissal of the plaintiff Margaret Mazur's Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § ; 2000a et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 retaliation claims that are based upon the plaintiff filing an EEOC Charge in July 2016 ("the First/2016 EEOC Charge"); said claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent that Ms. Mazur 9;s Title VII and § 1981 retaliation claims are based upon Ms. Mazur being retaliated against for complaining about disparate treatment and racial discrimination and requesting relief from this disparate treatment and racial discrimination in Ju ne 2016, these retaliation claims remain a part of Ms. Mazur's case against SWVC and DMVA. Plaintiff is permitted leave to file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint that contains Title VII and § 1981 retaliation claims base d upon her filing the First/2016 EEOC Charge no later than September 4, 2018. The plaintiff's motion must include a proposed second amended complaint. Ms. Mazur's proposed second amended complaint, if she chooses to file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to include Title VII and § 1981 retaliation claims against SWVC and DMVA based upon her filing the First/2016 EEOC Charge in July 2016, must consist of one stand-alone document, must contain within the body of the pleading all factual allegations upon which Ms. Mazur relies in bringing her Title VII and § 1981 retaliation claims against the defendants, and must be organized in a manner from which it is clear upon which facts Ms. Mazur relies for each of her claims. No external documents are to be "incorporated by reference" into the second amended complaint; exhibits can be attached to the second amended complaint. Failure to follow these instructions will result in the court sua sponte dismissing the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint for failure to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/17/2018. (bfm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
