THE VALSPAR CORPORATION et al v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.
| VALSPAR CORPORATION and VALSPAR SOURCING, INC. |
| PPG INDUSTRIES INC. |
| 2:2017cv01023 |
| August 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1116
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 1082 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, 1110 MOTION for New Trial under Rule 59 filed by SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY and 1108 Renewed MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law under Rule 50(b) filed by SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 6/15/2022. (map)
|
|
Filing
1079
ORDER granting 1076 MOTION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal. DO NOT electronically file the sealed version of the document until you electronically file the redacted version of the document, using the Redacted Document even t, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. You are required to serve the sealed document on counsel using traditional service methods. Decision to Unseal Document deferred. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 2/28/2022. (map)
|
|
Filing
1032
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 1011 SPECIAL MASTER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, filed by HENRY M. SNEATH. The special masters R&R 1011 will be adopted in part as the opinion of the court, as modified and supplemented in the opinion, and denied in part. The court endeavored to resolve as many disputes as possible prior to trial, but recognizes that some disputes may be context-dependent and require resolution at trial. The parties shall continue to meet and confer to resolve their remaining dispute s about exhibits and deposition designations, including their disputes about demonstrative exhibits ( 1011 at 13). The parties joint set of exhibits shall be submitted by the parties no later than 12/29/21; see 1024 . The parties are reminded that evidence admitted at trial will not be sealed. An appropriate order follows. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/21/21. (cjo)
|
|
Filing
1021
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 1020 Order on Motion for Clarification. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/1/21. (mh)
|
|
Filing
996
MEMORANDUM OPINION adopting in part 965 SPECIAL MASTER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, filed by HENRY M. SNEATH. 896 Sherwin Williams MOTION in Limine No. 15 is denied. 893 Sherwin Williams MOTION in Limine No. 14 is granted. Sherw ins Daubert challenge to Milanis supplemental opinion opinion 899 will be : (1) granted with respect to references to the impact f Akzos trialing during the original damages period; (2) denied with respect to Milanis references to the the Perez P atent as a basis for his reasonable royalty opinions; and (3) denied without prejudice with respect to Milanis proposed apportionment range. PPGs Daubert challenge to Kearls supplemental opinion 907 will be: be: (1) denied with respect to Kea rls price erosion/sticky prices opinions, with the proviso that those opinions would open the door for rebuttal evidence about Akzos trialing activities (with an appropriate limiting instruction); (2) denied without prejudice with respect to Kearls o pinion about about long -term contracts; (3) denied with respect to Kearls reasonable royalty opinion; and (4) denied with respect to Kearls Red Bull opinion. It is not not necessary to rule on the portion of PPGs motion seeking to exclude Kearls c onvoyed sales and injunctive relief opinion because b Sherwin represents that opinion will not be presented to the jury. To the extent that that Kearls and Milanis opinions rely on undocumented conversations with other persons, it will be incumb ent upon the the party seeking to offer that that opinion to establish a proper foundation. The opposing party may renew its Daubert challenge to those opinions opinions if a proper foundation is not laid. Details more fully stated in the opinion. An appropriate order will will be entered. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/27/21. (cjo)
|
|
Filing
945
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 943 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/20/21. (mh)
|
|
Filing
870
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION re 867 Memorandum Opinion on Objections to R&R 803 and 804. The amended opinion clarifies section II(A) of the opinion regarding references to the stipulation of infringement. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/23/21. (mh)
|
|
Filing
867
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 866 Order on Motion in Limine,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/11/21. (mh)
|
|
Filing
864
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 863 Order on Motion in Limine, Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Sealed Motion. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 2/18/21. (mh)
|
|
Filing
859
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 858 Order on R&R 761. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 1/21/21. (mh)
|
|
Filing
780
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 779 Order on RR 631 and 632. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 11/19/20. (mh)
|
|
Filing
636
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 635 Order on special master R&R 555,556,558 and 561. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/27/20. (mh)
|
|
Filing
530
OPINION AND ORDER denying 351 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 366 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 371 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 374 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 493 Motion for Entry of Judgment un der Rule 54(b); granting in part and denying in part 495 Motion ; granting 497 Motion ; granting 500 Motion ; denying 502 Motion to Modify; denying 493 Motion to Stay ; adopting R&R # 490 in part; adopting R&R # 491, as explained therein.. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 3/18/20. (mh)
|
|
Filing
323
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 310 Motion to adopt and modify Special Master's R&R. The Special Master's R&R is adopted as modified and explained therein. Within 2 days of completion of expert discovery, the number of asserted claims shall be reduced to 12 for purposes of summary judgment. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/20/18. (mh)
|
|
Filing
279
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: Claim Construction Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 8/13/2018. (ahm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
