KENGERSKI v. THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
| JEFFREY KENGERSKI |
| THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and ORLANDO HARPER |
| 2:2017cv01048 |
| August 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Mark R. Hornak |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
267
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 262 Motion for Attorney Fees with specified reductions. The Court awards Mr. Kengerski attorneys' fees of $403,455 and costs of $15,241.67. These fees and costs shall be paid by Defendant within 10 days of this Order. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 5/26/2023. (pak)
|
|
Filing
260
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 221 motion for prejudgment interest. Consistent with Mr. Kengerski's expert's calculations at ECF 259 -1, the Court awards $67,565 as prejudgment interest on backpay to Mr. Kengerski. An amended judgment consistent with this Order and the Court's 254 Order on the motions to amend the judgment follows. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 4/25/2023. (pak)
|
|
Filing
240
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 221 Motion for Award of Front Pay/Back Pay. The Court awards $223,361.00 in backpay and $229,255.00 in front pay to Mr. Kengerski. The Court defers ruling on an award of prejudgment interest until after entry of judgment and resolution of all post-judgment motions. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 1/20/2023. (pak)
|
|
Filing
235
ORDER denying 215 Motion for Declaration of Mistrial. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 12/14/2022. (bjb)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER. As discussed on the record at the 9/27/2022 final pretrial conference, the Court resolves the following objections to the parties' exhibits. (1) Objections to exhibit nos. 2, 17, 19A, 19B, 20A, 20B, 21, and 22 are sustained. (2) As stated on the record, Plaintiff withdrew his objections to exhibit nos. 29, 30, 32, and 33, except that Plaintiff objects to the authenticity of exhibit no. 30. The Court overrules that objection subject to Defendants laying a foundation for its admissibil ity at trial. (3) The Court sustains Defendant's objection to exhibit no. 36. Plaintiff represented that Warden Harper was not aware of this report, and therefore the exhibit does not relate to what Warden Harper knew at the time of Mr. Kengersk i's termination or the process he undertook in reaching that decision. Daniels v. Sch. Dist. of Philadelphia, 776 F.3d 181, 196 (3d Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the report is not relevant and its probative value is substantially outweighed by the ri sk of unfair prejudice, waste, or confusion. Fed. R. Evid. 403. (4) The Court overrules Plaintiff's objection to exhibit no. 57 without prejudice and subject to Defendant's authenticating the exhibit at trial. (5) As to exhibit nos. 62 and 63, the parties are directed to confer regarding those exhibits as part of the deposition designation process, attempt to resolve any disputes, and raise any unresolved disputes with the Court prior to trial. (6) The Court affirms its decision to exc lude exhibit nos. 65 and 66, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order 176 concerning Defendant's motion in limine #5, primarily on the basis of Rule 403. (7) The Court overrules Defendant's objection to exhibit no. 67 without prejudice and subject to Plaintiff's laying a foundation for its admissibility. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 9/27/2022. (pak)
|
|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 56 Motion for Summary Judgment, 73 Motion to Strike, and 74 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 10/19/2021. (av)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
