BAKALI v. JONES et al
| ABDUR RAUF BAKALI |
| GLENN A. JONES, EAGLE EXPRESS LINES, INC and ABC CORPS 1-10 |
| arbtre |
| 2:2017cv01162 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Robert C. Mitchell |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 46 Motion for Reconsideration re 45 Memorandum Opinion & Order Denying 37 Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Third-Party Complaint and Motion for Oral Argument filed by EAGLE EXPRESS LINES, INC, GLENN A. JONES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 7/11/2018. (spc)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER denying 37 Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 14 filed by EAGLE EXPRESS LINES, INC, GLENN A. JONES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on 6/20/2018. (spc)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM ORDER that Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer Venue is GRANTED; that this case shall be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and the Clerk shall transfer this case insofar as it exists in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Signed by Judge Michael A. Shipp on 9/5/2017. (mmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
