TALLEY v. WETZEL, et al
| QUINTEZ TALLEY |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE, TRACY SHAWLEY, ESMOND, RIX, R. POLYBLANK and UNKNOWN 3RD SHIFT C/O'S |
| 2:2018cv00230 |
| February 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Fayette |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
135
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 130 MOTION for an Indicative Ruling on a Motion for Relief that is Barred by a Pending Appeal by QUINTEZ TALLEY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 2/3/2023. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION. As explained in the Memorandum Opinion, Defendants' motion for summary judgment 59 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/4/2020. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 39 Partial Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by PLAINTIFF QUINTEZ TALLEY. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/30/2019. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/28/2018. (bsc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
