BROWN v. AGWAY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC

Plaintiff: JAMES BROWN
Defendant: AGWAY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv00321
Filed: March 13, 2018
Court: Pennsylvania Western District Court
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Fayette
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 13, 2018 44 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION indicating that, for reasons more fully stated within, Defendant Agway's Motion to Dismiss 21 is GRANTED. This case is dismissed with prejudice. An appropriate Order follows. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/13/18. (jg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROWN v. AGWAY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES BROWN
Represented By: Tiasha Palikovic
Represented By: D. Aaron Rihn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AGWAY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Represented By: Sydney Rochelle Normil
Represented By: Stanley Yorsz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?