WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
| JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON |
| GILMORE, GUTH and CITY OF PITTSBURGH |
| 2:2018cv00339 |
| March 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 90 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on September 21, 2021. (kcb)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER re 90 the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants GILMORE and GUTH. Plaintiff shall be allowed until July 1, 2020, to file his response in opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment as more fully set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on June 2, 2020. (kcb)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss and that Defendant City of Pittsburgh is dismissed with prejudice; adopting Report and Recommendations re 54 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is remanded back to the Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/4/2019. (smc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
