WASHINGTON v. COLGAN et al
| JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON |
| COLGAN, GILMORE, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2018cv00341 |
| March 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Greene |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER granting 32 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of Pittsburgh and they are dismissed from this action with prejudice; adopting Report and Recommendations re 52 Report and Recommendations as the Opinion of the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)-(iii), Defendants Gilmore and the State of Pennsylvania are sua sponte dismissed from this action with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining claim in this case is dism issed without prejudice because it is duplicative to claim one at Civil Action No. 17-988. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/4/2019. (smc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
