HENDRYCH v. SHELTAIR AVIATION SERVICES, LLC et al
| MARK HENDRYCH |
| SHELTAIR AVIATION SERVICES, LLC, SHELTAIR AVIATION LGA, LLC, JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2, JOHN DOE, 3 and JOHN DOE, 4 |
| 2:2018cv00701 |
| May 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Pittsburgh Office |
| Allegheny |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1.Plaintiff's Motion to Extend to Complete Depositions is Granted. Plaintiff shall complete expert depositions on or before July 15, 2021. Should Plaintiff's counsel not complete or find himself unable to comp lete depositions on or before July 15, 2021, absent lack of availability of defense counsel or defense experts, no further depositions shall occur. 2.Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Soule's Expert Report is denied, without prejudice.3.Plaint iff's Motion to Compel, with regard to document requests related to Mr. Boyd, is denied.4.Plaintiff's Motion to compel fact discovery related to the Ocean Air Quote and Comparable Aircraft is denied.5.Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answe rs to Requests for Admissions is denied.6.Plaintiff's Motion and Certificate of Conferral for Leave to File Supplemental Certificate of Conferral and Reply Supporting Extensions of Time, Strike, and Compel is denied as moot.7.On or before July 22, 2021, Counsel shall file a joint proposed scheduling order for any dispositive motions and/or Motions in Limine.Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 6/14/2021. (bjl)
|
|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part, denying in part, and deferring in part 127 Motion for Sanctions. It is hereby ordered as follows: 1. Borfitz Opinion Numbers 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10, as referenced in the opinion, are stricken. 2. The Court is taking no action at this time concerning Mr. Hendrych's report and opinions, in relation to the arguments in Defendant's Motion for Sanctions. 3. Defense counsel shall submit its fees and expenses incurred for the preparation of th eir Motion for Sanctions 127 and Reply Brief 131 on or before March 30, 2021. Any response from Plaintiff's counsel shall be filed on or before April 6, 2021. The response from Plaintiff's counsel shall be limited to the monetary amount of any sanctions and shall refrain from any further discussion on the merits of the motion for sanctions. 4. Should the parties reach any agreement regarding experts or the outcome of Defendant's Motion for Sanctions, they should so inform the court on or before April 6, 2021. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 3/22/2021. (bjl)
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AND Now, this 12th day of July 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (ECF No. 89), Defendants Response in Opposition (ECF No. 93), the arguments of counsel, and for the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs Moti on to Compel is DENIED in part and GRANTED in Part. It is hereby ordered as follows:1.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regard Requests for Production of Documents Nos. 1 and 2, is denied. Should an expert from Ocean Aire be so designated during expe rt discovery, the Plaintiff shall be permitted to conduct further discovery during the expert phase.2.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regards Interrogatories Nos. 8, is denied as premature to the extent it seeks expert opinions more properly raised d uring expert discovery.3.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regards Interrogatory No. 9, is denied.4.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regards Interrogatory No. 10 is denied as premature to the extent it seeks expert opinions more properly raised during e xpert discovery.5.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regards Integratory No. 11, is denied.6.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regards Interrogatory No. 7, is denied as premature to the extent it seeks expert opinions more properly raised during expert di scovery.7.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regards the Ocean Aire Subpoena, is denied as premature to the extent it seeks expert opinions more properly raised during expert discovery.8.Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, as regards the Piper Aircraft Subpoen a, is granted. Plaintiff shall serve the subpoena within seven (7) days of this order. No further fact discovery shall be permitted. Discovery shall close on August 20, 2019, as regards the Piper Aircraft Subpoena. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 7/12/2019. (bjl)
|
|
Filing
88
OPINION and ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of May 2019, after careful consideration of Hendrychs Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 77), Sheltairs Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (ECF Nos. 78 and 79), Hendrychs Brief in Opposition (ECF No. 80), S heltairs Reply Brief (ECF No. 81), Hendrychs Sur-Reply Brief (ECF No. 82), and for the foregoing reasons, Sheltairs Motion to Dismiss is granted. Hendrychs claims for punitive damages are dismissed. Defendant shall filed its Answer on or before June 4, 2019. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 5/21/2019. (bjl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
