BERNARD et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff: JOHN BERNARD and WILLIAM BERNARD
Defendant: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 2:2018cv00783
Filed: June 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Reed Eddy
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 261 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 164 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by BNY MELLON, N.A. motion is DEFERRED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 3/2/22. (kld)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 249 MEMORANDUM OPINION: Plaintiffs motion to strike the improper legal opinions of Defendants expert Debra L. Purrington 151 is DENIED without prejudice; Plaintiffs motion to strike the opinions of Defendants expert Bill Post about mutual funds 158 i s DENIED; Defendants motion to exclude Dr. Steve Pomerantz 202 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as outlined in the opinion; and Defendants motion to exclude David Kamons 204 is DENIED without prejudice. Details more fully stated in the opinion. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 2/7/22. (cjo)
March 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER indicating that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 143 ) as the Opinion of the Court and accepts the Magistrate's recommendation. Accordingly, BNY Mellon's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Dismiss (ECF No. 129 ) is hereby denied. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 3/31/21. (jg)
June 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER indicating that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation 106 as the Opinion of the Court and accepts the magistrate's recommendation. Accordingly, BNY Mellon's Motion to Dismiss 74 is hereby denied. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 6/4/20. (jg)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER indicating that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation 48 as the Opinion of the Court and accepts the magistrate's recommendation. Accordingly, BNY Mellon's Motion to Dismiss 31 is hereby denied. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/14/19. (jg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BERNARD et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN BERNARD
Represented By: Thomas J. Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BERNARD
Represented By: Thomas J. Farrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Represented By: Mary J. Hackett
Represented By: Nellie E. Hestin
Represented By: K. Issac deVyver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?