STEWART v. GEICO INSURANCE et al
ADAM STEWART |
GEICO INSURANCE, GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY and GEICO CORPORATION |
2:2018cv00791 |
June 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
Mark R. Hornak |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER granting 53 Motion in Limine. Plaintiff is precluded from introducing any evidence or testimony concerning the amount of the applicable UIM limits or the premiums paid for those limits. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 10/11/2020. (bjl) |
Filing 36 OPINION granting 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the claim for Bad Faith asserted by Dr. Stewart, in each instance and in the totality of circumstances, fails to produce sufficient evidence for any jury to conclude bad faith by clear and convincing evidence. As such, GEICOs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted. Dr. Stewarts claim for Bad Faith in Count II of his complaint is dismissed. A separate order will follow. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 2/19/2020. (bjl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.