SHERAW v. BLOOMIN BRANDS INC.
Plaintiff: CONNIE SHERAW
Defendant: BLOOMIN BRANDS INC.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00930
Filed: July 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Pittsburgh Office
County: Allegheny
Presiding Judge: Mark R Hornak
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion for LEE JANICZEK to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 8/23/18. (jad)
August 22, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION for attorney LEE JANICZEK to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-4836005) by BLOOMIN BRANDS INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Proposed Order) (Janiczek, Lee)
August 10, 2018 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF FILING by BLOOMIN BRANDS INC.. (Ballod, Christopher)
July 20, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE Of Notice of Removal To Adverse Party by BLOOMIN BRANDS INC. (Ballod, Christopher)
July 20, 2018 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement identifying Outback Steakhouse of Florida,LLC as corporate parent or other affiliate, by BLOOMIN BRANDS INC.. (Ballod, Christopher)
July 20, 2018 Filing 4 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad)
July 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 7/20/18. (jad)
July 20, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jad)
July 17, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from The Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-18-001665 with Jury Demand (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4797110) filed by BLOOMIN BRANDS INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Certificate of Service) (cel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHERAW v. BLOOMIN BRANDS INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CONNIE SHERAW
Represented By: Marc I. Simon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BLOOMIN BRANDS INC.
Represented By: Christopher E. Ballod
Represented By: Lee Janiczek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?