FRYE et al v. HARPER et al
GRETCHEN FRYE and ROSS S. FRYE |
ROBERT PRISTAS, ORLANDO HARPER, J. DOE #1, SIMON WAINWRIGHT, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, J. DOE #2 and ANDREW RUFFNER |
2:2018cv01023 |
August 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Pittsburgh Office |
Allegheny |
David S Cercone |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John A. Bacharach on behalf of ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER. (Bacharach, John) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (njt) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan M. Gesk on behalf of GRETCHEN FRYE, ROSS S. FRYE. (Gesk, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALLEGHENY COUNTY, J. DOE #1, J. DOE #2, ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT PRISTAS, ANDREW RUFFNER, SIMON WAINWRIGHT (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4816963), filed by ROSS S. FRYE, GRETCHEN FRYE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.