NORINGTON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC.
Plaintiff: LAKESHA L. NORINGTON
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC.
Case Number: 2:2018cv01136
Filed: August 28, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Nora Barry Fischer
Referring Judge: Maureen P Kelly
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER denying #5 Motion for Reconsideration; Plaintiff shall pay the entire filing fee by 11/9/18 or this matter will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/26/18. (jg)
October 23, 2018 Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re #4 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION to Correct Error of Courts re #4 Order on Report and Recommendations, Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by LAKESHA L. NORINGTON. Motions referred to Maureen P. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B1, #3 Exhibit C1, #4 Envelope) (ept)
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER indicating that the Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is denied. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the entire filing fee by 10/23/18 or the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute; that the Report and Recommendation #2 by Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly, is adopted as the opinion of the court. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/2/18. (jg)
September 24, 2018 Filing 3 OBJECTION and Reply to #2 Report and Recommendation, filed by LAKESHA L. NORINGTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tt)
September 6, 2018 Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by LAKESHA L. NORINGTON, recommending that the Motion be denied because Plaintiff has three strikes and fails to allege any danger of serious physical injury, yet alone, danger that is imminent. Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 9/24/2018. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9-6-2018. A copy of the Report together with this Notice of Electronic Filing are being sent to Plaintiff at the address of record via first class mail. (tmr)
September 6, 2018 Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly no longer presiding. (mao)
September 6, 2018 Judge Nora Barry Fischer is presiding and Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly is referred. (mao)
August 28, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LAKESHA L. NORINGTON. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Envelope) (ept)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NORINGTON v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAKESHA L. NORINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?