TARIN v. KNORR-BREMSE AG et al
| LUIS TARIN |
| FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., NEW YORK AIR BRAKE LLC, KNORR BRAKE COMPANY LLC, WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, KNORR-BREMSE AG, RICON CORPORATION, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT, S.A. and DOES 1-20 |
| 2:2018cv01153 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #2 Motion for appointment of class counsel. ERROR: Proposed Order was not attached. CORRECTION: Attorney is advised to file a proposed order by using the Proposed Order event and linking it to the document in question. This message is for informational purposes only. (jv) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for appointment of of class counsel by LUIS TARIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Exhibit b, #3 Exhibit c, #4 Exhibit d, #5 Exhibit e, #6 Exhibit f, #7 Exhibit g) (Rihn, D.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1-20, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., FAIVELEY TRANSPORT, S.A., KNORR BRAKE COMPANY LLC, KNORR-BREMSE AG, NEW YORK AIR BRAKE LLC, RICON CORPORATION, WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4845354), filed by LUIS TARIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
