BENNEY v. MCGINLEY et al
Petitioner: ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY
Respondent: THOMAS MCGINLEY, WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2018cv01223
Filed: September 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Maureen P Kelly
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 BRIEF in Support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Part 1), filed by ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Petition of Habeas Corpus part 2, #2 Envelope) (jv)
October 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Stay, this Section 2254 Habeas Case is stayed pending Petitioner's exhaustion of his state court remedies. The case is administratively closed and Petitioner may reopen the case by filing a Notice with this Court that he has exhausted his state court remedies no later than 45 days after having exhausted those remedies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/5/2018. (tmr)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Stay, MOTION Abeyance by ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv)
September 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668052026), filed by ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit C1, #3 Exhibit C3, #4 Exhibit E, #5 Exhibit F, #6 Exhibit G, #7 Exhibit H, #8 Exhibit I, #9 Exhibit J, #10 Exhibit K, #11 Exhibit L, #12 Exhibit M, #13 Exhibit O, #14 Exhibit P, #15 Exhibit Q1, #16 Exhibit Q2, #17 Exhibit R1, #18 Exhibit R2, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit W, #23 Exhibit Y, #24 Exhibit Z, #25 Exhibit AA, #26 Exhibit BB, #27 Exhibit CC, #28 Envelope, #29 Receipt) (jv).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BENNEY v. MCGINLEY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THOMAS MCGINLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT ALLEN BENNEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?