COLTON v. THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
| SAM COLTON |
| THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. |
| 2:2018cv01225 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Marilyn J Horan |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Marilyn J. Horan for all further proceedings. Judge Mark R. Hornak no longer assigned to case. All previously scheduled deadlines and proceedings shall remain in effect unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See order at 2:18-mc-1011. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 10/12/2018. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (admin1, )
|
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by SAM COLTON. THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. waiver sent on 9/25/2018, answer due 11/26/2018. (Narahari, Prabhu) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Prabhu Narahari on behalf of SAM COLTON. (Narahari, Prabhu) |
| Filing 4 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 9/18/18. (jad)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4862676), filed by SAM COLTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ept) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COLTON v. THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SAM COLTON | |
| Represented By: | Danielle M. Parks |
| Represented By: | Prabhu Narahari |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
