BOHANNON v. CAPOZZA et al
WILLIAM BOHANNON |
DAVID SADON, MARK CAPOZZA, SHAPIRO and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE |
2:2018cv01238 |
September 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Maureen P Kelly |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by WILLIAM BOHANNON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope Document mailed in) (ksa) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #17 Brief in Support - Other. ERROR: Document incorrectly linked. CORRECTION: Linked to appropriate document. This message is for informational purposes only. (ksa) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION to Grant Him Relase and any other Reliefs the Courts Might so Feel Necessary, #11 MOTION to Grant Him Release from these Unlawfuul Conditions and any other Reliefs the Courts so Feel Necessary filed by MARK CAPOZZA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DAVID SADON, SHAPIRO. (Diggs, Khadija) |
Filing 17 BRIEF in Support of #16 Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Respondents' Memo in support of Answer to Petition filed by MARK CAPOZZA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DAVID SADON, SHAPIRO. (Diggs, Khadija) Modified on 11/15/2018 document linkage corrected. Document linked to document #16 . (ksa) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Writ of Habeas Corpus re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by MARK CAPOZZA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DAVID SADON, SHAPIRO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Diggs, Khadija) |
|
Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by MARK CAPOZZA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DAVID SADON, SHAPIRO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Diggs, Khadija) |
|
Filing 12 MOTION to Grant Him Release and any other Reliefs the Courts Might so Feel Necessary by WILLIAM BOHANNON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Motion mailed in) (ksa) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Grant Him Release from these Unlawfuul Conditions and any other Reliefs the Courts so Feel Necessary by WILLIAM BOHANNON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Motion mailed in) (ksa) |
Filing 10 Remark: 6 Order of Court returned to Court as: Return to Sender. Released. The Order of Court will be remailed to SCI Fayette. (eca) |
|
Filing 8 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by MARK CAPOZZA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DAVID SADON, SHAPIRO. (Diggs, Khadija) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by MARK CAPOZZA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DAVID SADON, SHAPIRO. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Diggs, Khadija) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Khadija T. Diggs on behalf of MARK CAPOZZA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, DAVID SADON, SHAPIRO. (Diggs, Khadija) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by WILLIAM BOHANNON. MARK CAPOZZA served on 9/26/2018, answer due 10/17/2018; PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE served on 9/25/2018, answer due 10/16/2018; SHAPIRO served on 9/25/2018, answer due 10/16/2018. (ksa) |
|
|
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668052046), filed by WILLIAM BOHANNON. (Attachments: #1 Receipt for filing fee, #2 Envelope Petition mailed in) (ksa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.