LEE v. JANOSKO et al
| DONOVON LEE |
| CAPTAIN F. SALVAY, TROOPER BOARDMAN, FBI SPECIAL AGENT RARPAIN, CAPTAIN S. N. TEAGARDEN, TROOPER ADAM JANOSKO, LT. M. V. SMITH and L. FISCUS |
| 2:2018cv01297 |
| September 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by BOARDMAN. BOARDMAN waiver sent on 11/6/2018, answer due 1/7/2019. (Senich, John) |
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by S. N. TEAGARDEN, ADAM JANOSKO. S. N. TEAGARDEN waiver sent on 11/5/2018, answer due 1/4/2019; ADAM JANOSKO waiver sent on 11/5/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. (Senich, John) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by John P. Senich, Jr on behalf of BOARDMAN, ADAM JANOSKO, S. N. TEAGARDEN. (Senich, John) |
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER denying #12 Motion to Prevent Retaliation. Plaintiff's allegations are speculative and as such, his requested relief cannot be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/13/2018. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bsc)
|
| Filing 13 BRIEF in Support re #12 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by DONOVON LEE. (ksa) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Prevent Retaliation by DONOVON LEE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope Motion mailed in) (ksa) |
| Filing 11 US Marshal's Return as to Order, Complaint, Notice and Waiver executed on 10/31/2018. (ksa) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the United States Marshal is directed to mail a copy of the Complaint, notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, and waiver, and this order to Defendants, except for FBI Special Agent Rarpain, as directed by the Plaintiff, costs to be advanced by the United States of America. The Defendants are requested to waive service pursuant to Rule 4(d). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal is directed to mail a copy of the Complaint, a Summons, and this Order to Defendant FBI Special Agent Rarpain, The United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, and the Attorney General of the United States as directed by the Plaintiff, costs to be advanced by the United States of America. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/26/2018. (sms)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FOR SERVICE DOCUMENTS: Plaintiff shall provide the Court with proper instructions for service upon each named defendant listed in the Complaint including a U.S. Marshal Form 285, Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons (AO Form 398), and Waiver of the Service of Summons (AO Form 399) for each named defendant on or before November 1, 2018. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of this action. No extensions will be granted without good cause. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/11/2018. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (sms)
|
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER denying #5 Motion to Immediately Stay any Institutional Transfers by DONOVAN LEE. The federal courts are not tasked with the responsibility to run the prisons and the judiciary must not interfere with the responsibilities and administration of the executive branches of the government. It is well settled that a prisoner has no federal liberty interest guaranteeing that he remain in a particular prison, be transferred to another correctional facility, or be prevented from transferring to another correctional facility. If Petitioner believes he is being retaliated against, he should file an appropriate administrative grievance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/11/2018. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (sms)
|
| Filing 7 Authorization permitting withdrawal of prison account funds to pay filing fee by DONOVON LEE. (ksa) |
| Filing 6 BRIEF in Support re #5 Motion to Stay filed by DONOVON LEE. (ksa) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Immediately Stay any Institutional Transfers by DONOVON LEE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (ksa) Modified on 10/11/2018 to correct typo. (ksa) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against BOARDMAN, L. FISCUS, ADAM JANOSKO, RARPAIN, F. SALVAY, M. V. SMITH, S. N. TEAGARDEN Filing fee $400, ), filed by DONOVON LEE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ksa) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to file the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/5/2018. (sms)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/5/2018. (sms)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DONOVON LEE. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Authorization to be Completed by Prisoner who Seeks Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #3 Envelope Documents mailed in) (ksa) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/3/2018) (sms). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/3/2018: #4 Motion to Immediately Stay Any Institutional Transfers, #5 Brief in Support of Motion, #6 Proposed Order) (sms). Modified on 10/3/2018 to separate Motion, Brief, and Proposed Order from Complaint. (sms) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
