WINTNER-SMOOKE v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY
| KERRY WINTNER-SMOOKE |
| GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY |
| 2:2018cv01358 |
| October 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Arthur J Schwab |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Mediation: Case has not been resolved. The parties are reminded of their obligation to complete the ADR questionnaire and submit within 5 days of the conclusion of the ADR process. The questionnaire can be accessed at www.pawd.uscourts.gov. Click on the ADR icon. Mediation session was held on 11/19/2018. (Caruso, Gary) |
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING Initial Case Management Conference for 1/8/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 7C before Judge Arthur J. Schwab. Rule 26(f) Report, Proposed Case Management Order, and ADR Stipulation are due 12/26/18. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/2/18. (lck)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 10/18/18. (ms)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (ms) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY. (Hudock, Joseph) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly recused. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/15/18. (eca)
|
| Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly now presiding. (av) |
| Judge Arthur J. Schwab presiding. Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly no longer assigned to case. (av) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY, INC as corporate parent or other affiliate, by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY. (ksa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD 18-012181 Copies attached: State Court complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4892042), filed by GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint) (ksa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WINTNER-SMOOKE v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: KERRY WINTNER-SMOOKE | |
| Represented By: | Carlyle J. Engel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Joseph A. Hudock, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
