FANTAUZZI v. WETZEL et al
REINALDO FANTALIZZI and REINALDO FANTAUZZI |
CYNTHIA LINK, B. LUCCI, JOHN E. WETZEL, OFFICER FERRARI and CAPOZZA |
2:2018cv01492 |
November 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
David S Cercone |
Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case opened in EDPA at 18-5166. (sdp) |
Case electronically transferred to District of Easter District of Pennsylvania. (sdp) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM ORDER directing that the Clerk transfer this case FORTHWITH to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Division. Ruling on plaintiff's pending Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is deferred to transferee court. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 11/28/18. (njt) |
Judge David S. Cercone is presiding and Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan is referred. (mao) |
Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan no longer presiding. (mao) |
Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by REINALDO FANTALIZZI. (sdp) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by REINALDO FANTALIZZI. (Attachments: #1 Authorization, #2 Complaint, #3 Envelope) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.