PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
| PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and LENA REIGLEMAN |
| 2:2018cv01498 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Peter J Phipps |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachael L. Dizard on behalf of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. (Dizard, Rachael) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate by PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION. (Aaron, Douglas) Text modified on 11/13/2018. (ept) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney Aaron advised to file statement within 7 days. This message is for informational purposes only. Disclosure Statement due by 11/15/2018. (ksa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LENA REIGLEMAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4925660), filed by PERMANENT GENERAL ASSURANCE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A) (ksa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
