KEATON v. KEANE GROUP, INC et al
GEORGE KEATON |
KEANE GROUP, INC, JEREMY PATRICK and AUSTIN MCCURDY |
2:2018cv01629 |
December 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Peter J Phipps |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas G. Collins on behalf of KEANE GROUP, INC, AUSTIN MCCURDY, JEREMY PATRICK. (Collins, Thomas) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by GEORGE KEATON. KEANE GROUP INC, waiver sent on 12/7/18, answer due 2/5/19; AUSTIN MCCURDY waiver sent on 1/10/19 answer due 3/11/19, JEREMY PATRICK waiver sent on 12/18/18 answer due on 2/19/19 (Attachments: #1 Waiver of Service for Patrick, #2 Waiver of Service for McCurdy) (Pahuta, Nicholas) Modified text on 1/18/2019. (cel) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by GEORGE KEATON. AUSTIN MCCURDY served on 12/15/2018, answer due 1/7/2019. (Pahuta, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Marcus B. Schneider on behalf of GEORGE KEATON. (Schneider, Marcus) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to KEANE GROUP, INC, AUSTIN MCCURDY, JEREMY PATRICK (jd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KEANE GROUP, INC, AUSTIN MCCURDY, JEREMY PATRICK (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4955723), filed by GEORGE KEATON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.