NEWTON v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
| ROBERT M. NEWTON |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE |
| 2:2018cv01639 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ROBERT M. NEWTON. (Lykos, Nikki)
|
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER. In accordance with the case management system in place in this district, this case has been assigned to the undersigned for all pretrial matters. Therefore, it is ORDERED that on or before 02/08/19, Plaintiff (Defendant having already filed #6 an election form) shall complete an election form either consenting to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned to the case, and shall file the form with the Clerk's Office. A copy of the form can be found on this Court's website at: http://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Consent-to-Mag.pdf. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 01/28/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (ard)
|
|
Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE by 02/11/19. (ard)
|
|
Full Consent to Proceed before US Mag. Judge received by parties. (ard)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE. (Senich, John)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ROBERT M. NEWTON. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE waiver sent on 12/11/2018, answer due 2/11/2019. (Lykos, Nikki)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by John P. Senich, Jr on behalf of PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE. (Senich, John)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Bradley on behalf of PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE. (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Colleen Ramage Johnston on behalf of ROBERT M. NEWTON. (Johnston, Colleen)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4957305), filed by ROBERT M. NEWTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ept)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NEWTON v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE | |
| Represented By: | Scott A. Bradley |
| Represented By: | John P. Senich, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ROBERT M. NEWTON | |
| Represented By: | Nikki Velisaris Lykos |
| Represented By: | Colleen Ramage Johnston |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
