BAKER v. NEW PROSPECT COMPANY
| TOMMY BAKER |
| NEW PROSPECT COMPANY |
| 2:2019cv00063 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER denying, without prejudice, #10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss/to Compel Arbitration, Plaintiff having filed an Amended Complaint #18 on 3/12/19. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/13/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jg)
|
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by TOMMY BAKER. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 18 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against TOMMY BAKER TOMMY BAKER answer due 3/26/2019, filed by TOMMY BAKER. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 17 REDACTION to #10 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Compel Arbitration Exhibit A by NEW PROSPECT COMPANY. (Wilkin, Bruce) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by William F. Goodrich on behalf of TOMMY BAKER. (Goodrich, William) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua P. Geist on behalf of TOMMY BAKER. (Geist, Joshua) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER that New Prospect shall file a redacted version of Exhibit A to its Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Compel Arbitration #10 as such exhibit contains personal identifiers in violation of Local Rule 5.2.D. and has been removed from public view. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/21/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jg)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER ON MOTIONS PRACTICE (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/20/19. (jg)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Bruce R. Wilkin, Esquire to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of defendant. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 2/20/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jg)
|
| Filing 11 Subject to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Compel Arbitration, Defendant's Original ANSWER to #1 Complaint by NEW PROSPECT COMPANY. (Wilkin, Bruce) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION to Compel Arbitration by NEW PROSPECT COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Declarartion, #2 Proposed Order) (Wilkin, Bruce) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for attorney Bruce R. Wilkin to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5034376) by NEW PROSPECT COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Proposed Order) (Wilkin, Bruce) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by TOMMY BAKER. NEW PROSPECT COMPANY served on 1/29/2019, answer due 2/19/2019. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for William R. Liles, Esquire to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 1/24/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jg)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for attorney William R. Liles to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5003289) by TOMMY BAKER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of William R. Liles, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of good standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Liles, William ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael A. Josephson on behalf of TOMMY BAKER. (Josephson, Michael) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 1/22/19. (jg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jg) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to NEW PROSPECT COMPANY (jv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NEW PROSPECT COMPANY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5000598), filed by TOMMY BAKER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Summons as to New Prospect Company) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BAKER v. NEW PROSPECT COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TOMMY BAKER | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Josephson |
| Represented By: | William Liles |
| Represented By: | Andrew W. Dunlap |
| Represented By: | William F. Goodrich |
| Represented By: | Joshua P. Geist |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NEW PROSPECT COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Bruce R. Wilkin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
