WYNNYCKYJ v. CACH, LLC et al
| JULIAN WYNNYCKYJ |
| CACH, LLC, RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP and PRESSLER FELT & WARSHAW, LLP |
| 2:2019cv00191 |
| February 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF COURT. This action has been resolved and the only matter remaining to be completed is the submission of a stipulation for dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk mark the above-captioned action CLOSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction of this matter to consider any issue arising during the period when such stipulation is being finalized, including but not limited to enforcing any settlement. The Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/18/19 at 9:30 AM is CANCELLED. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 3/14/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jad)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #5 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and Reschedule Initial Conference. It is hereby ORDERED that the time for all named Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby EXTENDED to 3/14/19. The Telephonic Status Conference set for 3/6/19 at 9:30 AM is hereby RESCHEDULED for 3/18/19 at 9:30 AM. Please use dial-in number 2 for this conference. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/27/19. (bdb)
|
| Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer until March 14, 2019 as to all Defendants and to adjourn the telephonic conference scheduled for March 6, 2019 until a date after March 14, 2019 by PRESSLER & PRESSLER, LLP, PRESSLER FELT & WARSHAW, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Grimes, Francis) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER. A Telephonic Status Conference is hereby SCHEDULED for 3/6/19 at 9:30 AM before Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak. Please login to ECF and refer to #3 AT&T Scheduling Notice and use dial-in no. 2 for this conference. Attorney Grimes is directed to ensure counsel as to all Defendants are aware of this Order and prepared to dial-in and participate. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/25/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
|
| Filing 3 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (bdb) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/25/19. (bdb)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, case number AR-18-004842 with Jury Demand. Copies attached: Complaint. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5038108), filed by PRESSLER FELT & WARSHAW, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
