KNIGHTLY v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION
| SHAWN KNIGHTLY |
| CENTIMARK CORPORATION |
| 2:2019cv00304 |
| March 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Peter J Phipps |
| Labor: Other |
| 29 U.S.C. § 206 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Wilk on behalf of CENTIMARK CORPORATION. (Wilk, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 34
Case transferred in from District of Massachusetts; Case Number 1:18-cv-12269. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
|
|
Filing 33
Case transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet sent to Clerk in that district. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing 32
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered.Order of Transfer. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing 31
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. #9 Motion to Dismiss and/or Transfer Case is ALLOWED to the extent that the case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for further proceedings. The remainder of CentiMarks motion is DENIED. The clerk shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing 30
Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: Motion Hearing held on 3/15/2019; The court hears oral argument on the motion to transfer and takes the motion under advisement. re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by CentiMark Corporation. (Court Reporter: Rachel Lopez at raeufp@gmail.com.) (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing 29
ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting Hearing on Motion #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. : The Motion Hearing has been reset for 3/15/2019 11:00 AM in Courtroom 13 before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing 28
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #27 Motion to Continue. The motion hearing has been rescheduled to 3/15/19 at 11:00am (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing 27
Assented to MOTION to Continue hearing to March 12, 13 or 15 by Shawn Knightly.(Herold, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 26
ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion: The Court will hold a hearing on #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on 3/8/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 13 before District Judge Leo T. Sorokin. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing 25
REPLY to Response to #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by CentiMark Corporation. (Tuite, Jaime)
|
|
Filing 24
ADDENDUM re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by Shawn Knightly. (Herold, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 23
Supplemental MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by CentiMark Corporation. (Tuite, Jaime)
|
|
Filing 22
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON MOTION TO TRANSFER (DOC. NO. 9) entered. Accordingly, CentiMark, as the proponent of the motion, shall make a supplemental filing addressing these questions, limited to ten pages, no later than January 11, 2019. Knightly may make a supplemental filing in response, limited to ten pages, no later than January 18, 2019. CentiMark may file a reply limited to four pages by January 25, 2019. No further briefing will be allowed unless specifically invited by the Court. The Court expresses no opinion on the parties' other arguments, which remain under advisement. re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by CentiMark Corporation(Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing 21
Declaration of Christopher Bauer in Support of #20 Sur-Reply to Motion, by Shawn Knightly. (Herold, Suzanne) Modified on 12/21/2018 to correct event (Montes, Mariliz).
|
|
Filing 20
SUR-REPLY to Motion re #18 MOTION for Leave to File Sur Reply, #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by Shawn Knightly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Herold, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 19
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWED. No further briefing on the pending motion. re #18 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing 18
MOTION for Leave to File Sur Reply by Shawn Knightly.(Herold, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 17
REPLY to Response to #14 Cross MOTION to Remand in Response to Defendant's Motion to Transfer filed by CentiMark Corporation. (Tuite, Jaime)
|
|
Filing 16
Set Deadlines as to #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.. Replies due by 12/13/2018. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing 15
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Knightly's cross-motion to remand, Doc. No. 14, is DENIED because the case clearly meets the requirements for this Court's diversity jurisdiction. CentiMark may file a reply to Knightly's opposition to its motion to transfer, limited to five pages, by December 13, 2018. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing 14
Cross MOTION to Remand in Response to Defendant's Motion to Transfer by Shawn Knightly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Herold, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 13
Opposition re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by Shawn Knightly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Herold, Suzanne)
|
|
Filing 12
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Responses due by 11/30/2018 (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing 11
Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to November 30, 2018 to File Opposition to Motion to Transfer by Shawn Knightly.(Herold, Suzanne) (Modified on 11/26/2018 to Correct CM/ECF Filing Event) (Paine, Matthew).
|
|
Filing 10
MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. filed by CentiMark Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Employment Agreement of Shawn Knightly)(Hanaka, Philip)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Transfer Case to United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. by CentiMark Corporation.(Hanaka, Philip)
|
|
Filing 8
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Jaime S. Tuite. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Jaime S. Tuite Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-7405543 by CentiMark Corporation.(Hanaka, Philip)
|
|
Filing 6
Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet re 3 Notice (Other) by CentiMark Corporation. (Hanaka, Philip)
|
|
Filing 5
Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail.(Burgos, Sandra)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Local Category Form. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. (Burgos, Sandra)
|
|
Filing 2
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by CentiMark Corporation. (Hanaka, Philip)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by CentiMark Corporation ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7388405 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint and Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanaka, Philip)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KNIGHTLY v. CENTIMARK CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CENTIMARK CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | Jaime S. Tuite |
| Represented By: | Philip M. Hanaka |
| Represented By: | Ryan Wilk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SHAWN KNIGHTLY | |
| Represented By: | Suzanne L. Herold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
