KRAMER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
| ROBERT KRAMER |
| SHIRLEY EPPERSON, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, WILLIAM PEDUTO, EDWARD GREEN, SCOTT SHUBERT and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S) |
| 2:2019cv00539 |
| May 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Yvonne Schlosberg Hilton on behalf of CITY OF PITTSBURGH, SHIRLEY EPPERSON, EDWARD GREEN, WILLIAM PEDUTO, SCOTT SHUBERT. (Hilton, Yvonne) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily McNally on behalf of CITY OF PITTSBURGH, SHIRLEY EPPERSON, EDWARD GREEN, WILLIAM PEDUTO, SCOTT SHUBERT. (McNally, Emily) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Julie E. Koren on behalf of CITY OF PITTSBURGH, SHIRLEY EPPERSON, EDWARD GREEN, WILLIAM PEDUTO, SCOTT SHUBERT. (Koren, Julie) |
Filing 2
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/10/10. (jhi)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CITY OF PITTSBURGH, SHIRLEY EPPERSON, EDWARD GREEN, WILLIAM PEDUTO, SCOTT SHUBERT (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5130657), filed by ROBERT KRAMER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
