THOMAS v. MARTIN et al
BRUCE THOMAS |
DAVID LINCOLN, JOHN DOE #1, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, BRIAN BURGUNDER, DAVID HONICK, BRIAN MARTIN, JOHN DOE #2 and DETECTIVE MURRAY |
2:2019cv00617 |
May 24, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Cathy Bissoon |
Peter J Phipps |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 6/10/19. (jhi) |
Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Bissoon for all further proceedings. Judge Peter J. Phipps no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Peter J. Phipps on 06/10/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to BRIAN BURGUNDER, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, DAVID HONICK, DAVID LINCOLN, BRIAN MARTIN, MURRAY (ept) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRIAN BURGUNDER, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, DAVID HONICK, DAVID LINCOLN, BRIAN MARTIN, MURRAY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5151225), filed by BRUCE THOMAS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Burgunder, #3 Summons City of Pittsburgh, #4 Summons Honick, #5 Summons Lincoln, #6 Summons Martin, #7 Summons Murray) (ept) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.