BLAIR v. GILMORE et al
ZACHARY BLAIR |
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and ROBERT GILMORE |
2:2019cv00647 |
June 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Maureen P Kelly |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
STATE COURT RECORDS received from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County County and forwarded to Mag. Judge Magistrate Judge Kelly. Case Number: 2013-15391. Transcript Numbers: T17-1371, T18-0906, T13-2524. (nll) |
Filing 12 TEXT ORDER: In accordance with the case management system in place in this district, this case has been assigned to the undersigned for all pretrial matters. Therefore, it is ORDERED that on or before 08/15/2019, Petitioner shall complete an election form either consenting to jurisdiction by the Magistrate Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned to the case, and shall file the form with the Clerk's Office. A copy of the form can be found on this Court's website at: http://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Consent-to-Mag.pdf. Consent to Jurisdiction by Mag. Judge or electing to have a District Judge assigned due by 8/15/2019; Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 07/25/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. A copy of this Order and the election form have been mailed to Petitioner's address of record. (tjw) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17) (Vernacchio, Daniel) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: ROBERT GILMORE answer due 7/24/2019; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA answer due 7/24/2019; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY answer due 7/24/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 07/09/2019. A copy of this Notice and Order have been mailed to Petitioner's address of record. (tjw) |
Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by ZACHARY BLAIR by ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Vernacchio, Daniel) |
Filing 8 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY. (Vernacchio, Daniel) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel A. Vernacchio on behalf of ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY. (Vernacchio, Daniel) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ZACHARY BLAIR. ROBERT GILMORE served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY served on 6/14/2019, answer due 7/5/2019. (ksa) |
Filing 5 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Order supersedes the Service Order of June 6, 2019, ECF. No. #4 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT on or before July 10, 2019 the Respondents shall answer or otherwise respond to the allegations of the Petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 06/19/2019. A copy of this notice and Order have been mailed to Petitioner's address of record. (tjw) |
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the petition, upon the respondents by certified mail - return receipt requested, costs to be advanced by the United States. Within 21 days of service of this order, respondents shall respond to the allegations of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Attorney shall furnish this court with the state court records. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 06/06/2019. (tjw) |
Filing 3 Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee. ECF No. #1 . The Petitioner has also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. ECF No. #2 . Given that the Petitioner has paid the filing fee, the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 06/06/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. A copy of this Order has been mailed to Petitioner's address of record. (tjw) |
Remark: Service Copies forwarded to US Marshals this date. (tjw) |
Remark: Copies of notice and Order at ECF No. 4 mailed to Petitioner's address of record this date. (tjw) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ZACHARY BLAIR. (Attachments: #1 Monthly Account Statement) (ksa) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 24668058574), filed by ZACHARY BLAIR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Receipt for filing fee, #5 Envelope documents mailed in) (ksa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.