MASSEY v. ESTOCK et al
Plaintiff: WESLEY A. MASSEY
Defendant: LEE ESTOCK, SUSAN BERGEY, DAN YINGLING, COUNSELOR MOTTIN and ROBERT BEHR
Case Number: 2:2019cv00659
Filed: June 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Maureen P Kelly
Referring Judge: Richard A Lanzillo
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #2 TRO Application and Petition for Injunctive Relief Remark, by WESLEY A. MASSEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd)
June 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying order, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lanzillo for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly no longer assigned to case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 06/17/2019. A copy of this notice and Order have been mailed to Plaintiff's address of record. (tjw)
June 6, 2019 Filing 2 Remark: (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Declaration, #3 Memorandum of law with Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Preliminary Injunction, #4 Envelope documents mailed in) (ksa) Modified text on 6/6/2019. (ksa) Modified text on 6/6/2019. (ksa)
June 6, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by WESLEY A. MASSEY. (Attachments: #1 Authorization to be Completed by Prisoner Who Seeks Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Envelope motion mailed in) (ksa) Modified text on 6/6/2019. (ksa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MASSEY v. ESTOCK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEE ESTOCK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSAN BERGEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAN YINGLING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNSELOR MOTTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT BEHR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WESLEY A. MASSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?