SOUZA et al v. CONTROVERSY, LLC et al
JAIME EDMONDSON-LONGORIA, BROOKE JOHNSON, ALANA MARIE SOUZA, MASHA LUND, CIELO JEAN GIBSON, LAURIE YOUNG, JAIME LONGORIA, JAMILLETTE GAXIOLA, CJ GIBSON, BROOKE TAYLOR, CLAUDIA SAMPEDRO, LAURIE ROMEO, MALU LUND, LUCY PINDER, ALANA CAMPOS and EVA PEPAJ |
CONTROVERSY, LLC and MARK LATORRE |
2:2019cv00691 |
June 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (smc) |
Filing 2 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (jjg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CONTROVERSY, LLC, MARK LATORRE (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5171934), filed by CIELO JEAN GIBSON, EVA PEPAJ, JAMILLETTE GAXIOLA, JAIME EDMONDSON-LONGORIA, LUCY PINDER, BROOKE JOHNSON, ALANA MARIE SOUZA, MASHA LUND, LAURIE YOUNG, CLAUDIA SAMPEDRO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.