CAMERON v. CAPOZZA
Petitioner: DARYL EUGENE CAMERON
Respondent: MARK CAPOZZA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY
Case Number: 2:2019cv00840
Filed: July 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Patricia L Dodge
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed; MARK CAPOZZA served on 9/3/2019, answer due 9/24/2019; DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY served on 9/3/2019, answer due 9/24/2019. (plp)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to add as a Respondent the District Attorney of Mercer County; directing the United States Marshal to make service of this order, together with a copy of the #4 Petition and #5 Brief upon Respondents; within 14 days of service of this order, counsel for Respondents must enter their appearance; this case is STAYED and administratively CLOSED while Petitioner litigates challenges to his judgment of sentence in state court; within 30 days after the completion of the state-court proceedings, Petitioner shall notify this Court of the outcome of those proceedings; in the event that he does not receive the relief he seeks in state court, this Court will reopen this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 8/19/19. (jpe)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Case Stayed (jpe)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 BRIEF in Support of #4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by DARYL EUGENE CAMERON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (plp)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DARYL EUGENE CAMERON. (plp)
August 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Dodge on 8/2/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jpe)
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by DARYL EUGENE CAMERON. (plp)
July 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis lodged pending payment of the filing fee or the filing of a motion to proceed IFP. (Attachments: #1 inmate account statement, #2 Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #3 Exhibit, #4 Envelope) (plp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CAMERON v. CAPOZZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DARYL EUGENE CAMERON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARK CAPOZZA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?