STEWART v. LEWIS et al
NORA STEWART |
AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., DEBORAH LEWIS, ALBERT SANTUCCI and AMAZON.COM, INC. |
2:2019cv00847 |
July 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Peter J Phipps |
J Nicholas Ranjan |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
Filing 19 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Schwartz, Jason) |
Filing 18 REPLY BRIEF re #16 Response to Motion, #17 Brief in Opposition to Motion filed by NORA STEWART. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service) (Kelley, G.) |
Filing 17 BRIEF in Opposition re #13 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order) (Schwartz, Jason) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion re #13 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by DEBORAH LEWIS, ALBERT SANTUCCI. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order) (Graham, Gregory) |
w/ #13 MOTION to not sever the claims against homeowner defendents re #13 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by NORA STEWART by NORA STEWART. (nll) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #13 Motion to Remand to State Court. ERROR: Document should have been filed as two separate documents. CORRECTION: Attorney advised in future that documents of that nature are to be filed as separate documents. Clerk of Court docketed MOTION to not sever the claims against homeowner defendents. This message is for informational purposes only. (nll) |
|
Filing 14 BRIEF in Support re #13 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by NORA STEWART. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Kelley, G.) |
Filing 13 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by NORA STEWART. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service) (Kelley, G.) |
|
Filing 11 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by NORA STEWART. (Kelley, G.) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Schwartz, Jason) |
|
Filing 8 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. Answer due from AMAZON.COM, INC. on 9/6/2019; AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. on 9/6/2019. (Schwartz, Jason) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by DEBORAH LEWIS, ALBERT SANTUCCI. (Graham, Gregory) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregory P. Graham on behalf of DEBORAH LEWIS, ALBERT SANTUCCI. (Graham, Gregory) |
|
|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason C. Schwartz on behalf of AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC.. (Schwartz, Jason) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying Amazon.com, Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC. (nll) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Butler County Court of Common Pleas, case number 18-10764 Copies attached: Complaint, Praecipe for Writ of Summons, Praecipe for Appearance, Entry of Appearance, Praecipe for rule to file complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5212232), filed by AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (nll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.