JONES v. SCI SOMERSET et al
| JONATHAN PAUL JONES |
| SCI SOMERSET, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY |
| 2:2019cv00871 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Correspondence/copy of order received from JONATHAN PAUL JONES. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (plp) |
Filing 2
ORDER directing that the Clerks Office is to close out the current case filed at 19-cv-871, and is instead ORDERED to docket ECF No. 1 in this case as a Motion filed Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) in the Petitioner's First Habeas Case, i.e., Jones v. Shannon No. 08-cv-1266 (W.D.), together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk shall mark Civ. A. No. 19-871 CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 7/29/2019. A copy of this Order together with the Notice of Electronic Filing are being sent to Petitioner at his address of record via first class mail. (tmr)
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without filing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis lodged pending payment of the filing fee or disposition of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 correspondence, #2 Envelope) (plp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
