GRAY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
| JAMES F. GRAY |
| NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY |
| 2:2019cv00894 |
| July 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Zidian, Chloe) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Chloe C. Zidian on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Zidian, Chloe) |
Filing 9
INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report and Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 10/15/2019. Case Management set for 10/17/2019 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 5A before Judge Joy Flowers Conti. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/10/2019. (smc)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER ON MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 9/9/2019. (smc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (smc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Claude W. Anderson, Jr on behalf of JAMES F. GRAY. (Anderson, Claude) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Johnston, J.) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement identifying Norfolk Southern Corporation; Pocahontas Land Corp.; Thoroughbred Technology & Telecommunications, Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Johnston, J.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott D. Clements on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Clements, Scott) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Lawson Johnston on behalf of NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. (Johnston, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5222279), filed by JAMES F. GRAY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (av) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GRAY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | J. Lawson Johnston |
| Represented By: | Scott D. Clements |
| Represented By: | Chloe C. Zidian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES F. GRAY | |
| Represented By: | Henri Marcel |
| Represented By: | Claude W. Anderson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
