ZUFFA, LLC v. DENISE PERRIS et al
ZUFFA, LLC |
LYTLE CAFE, INC. and DENISE PERRIS |
2:2019cv00938 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Mark R Hornak |
Copyright |
47 U.S.C. ยง 553 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to DENISE PERRIS, LYTLE CAFE, INC. (nll) |
Filing 13 REQUEST by ZUFFA, LLC for entry of DEFAULT against DENISE PERRIS, LYTLE CAFE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Request for Entry of Default, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Clerk's Certificate, #3 Certificate of Service) (Lonstein, Wayne) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 11 Order to Show Cause, filed by ZUFFA, LLC. (Lonstein, Wayne) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Within seven (7) days of the date of this Order, counsel for the Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 9/16/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ZUFFA, LLC. DENISE PERRIS served on 8/7/2019, answer due 8/28/2019. (Lonstein, Wayne) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by ZUFFA, LLC. LYTLE CAFE, INC. served on 8/7/2019, answer due 8/28/2019. (Lonstein, Wayne) |
Filing 8 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 8/5/19. (jad) |
Filing 6 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jad) |
Filing 5 COPYRIGHT DOCUMENTS ISSUED. Emailed copy of Transmittal Letter, AO 121 Form, Complaint, Exhibits and Docket Sheet to the Register of Copyrights. (nll) |
Filing 4 AO 121 NOTICE by ZUFFA, LLC re #1 Complaint. (nll) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by ZUFFA, LLC. (nll) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to DENISE PERRIS, LYTLE CAFE, INC. (nll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DENISE PERRIS, LYTLE CAFE, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5231595), filed by ZUFFA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint-Advertisement, #2 Exhibit Report on the FIling of an Action Regarding Copyright, #3 Summons Denise Perris, #4 Summons Lytle Cafe, Inc., #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (nll) Attachment removed from public view and redocketed at #4 . Modified text on 8/2/2019. (nll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.