HOGAN et al v. TOTH et al
| OCEANA ORTH, CALEB NIGRELLI and KRISTEN HOGAN |
| AGENT TOTH, OFFICER FARRELL WAGNER, BRENTWOOD POLICE DEPT. and OFFICER CARL RECH |
| 2:2019cv01016 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by TOTH. (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Bradley on behalf of TOTH. (Bradley, Scott)
|
|
Filing 4
AMENDED COMPLAINT against BRENTWOOD POLICE DEPT., CARL RECH, TOTH, FARRELL WAGNER, filed by KRISTEN HOGAN, OCEANA ORTH. (cjo)
|
|
Filing 3
Filing fee: $400, receipt number 24668058724 (cjo)
|
|
Summons Issued as to BRENTWOOD POLICE DEPT., CARL RECH, TOTH, FARRELL WAGNER (cjo)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan on 8/29/2019. (av)
|
|
Amended Pleadings due by 9/30/2019 (av)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KRISTEN HOGAN, CALEB NIGRELLI, OCEANA ORTH. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons in a Civil Action, #4 Process Receipt and Return, #5 Waiver of the Service of Summons, #6 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive service of a summons) (jv)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
