RUPP v. SAUL
| MELISSA LYNN RUPP |
| ANDREW M. SAUL and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) |
| 2:2019cv01252 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Alan N Bloch |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to ANDREW M. SAUL (mao) |
| Filing 5 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by MELISSA LYNN RUPP (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Arnold, Beth) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Beth Arnold to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Alan N. Bloch on 10/8/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (lwp)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for attorney Beth Arnold to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # 0315-5309855) by MELISSA LYNN RUPP. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Exhibit) (Arnold, Beth) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER indicating that the above captioned matter is transferred to the Honorable Alan N. Bloch for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 10/2/19. (jg)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5302489), filed by MELISSA LYNN RUPP. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
