DAVIS v. PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES
Plaintiff: VIVIAN N. DAVIS
Defendant: PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES
Case Number: 2:2019cv01316
Filed: October 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: William S Stickman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Filing 16 Notice of Mediation by THOMAS T. FRAMPTON. Mediation Date January 16, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Goehring, Rutter & Boehm, Frick Building, 437 Grant St., 14th Floor, Pgh., PA 15219 (Frampton, Thomas)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Thomas T. Frampton is appointed as mediator. Mediation to be concluded by 02/03/20. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 12/03/19. (eca)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER IMPLEMENTING FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(d). Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 12/03/19. (eca)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 02/14/20; Joinder of Parties due 02/14/20; Exchange of initial disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) due by 01/15/20; Documents to be exchanged by 01/31/20; Discovery due by 05/29/20; Telephonic Post-Discovery Status Conference set for 06/01/20 at 9:00 AM; Fee records due by the 28th of each month; First disclosure due by 12/27/19. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 12/03/19. (eca)
December 3, 2019 Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William S. Stickman: Initial Case Management Conference held on 12/3/2019. (Court Reporter: None) (eca)
November 25, 2019 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #10 Stipulation Selecting ADR process. ERROR: Outdated Form. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to use the amended form with the revision date 4/2017. This message is for informational purposes only. (jmm)
November 22, 2019 Filing 11 Errata re #9 Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES. Reason for Correction: Paragraph 6 and 7 of the Rule 26f Report contained 2019 dates instead of 2020 dates.. (Shuber, Jordan)
November 22, 2019 Filing 10 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES. (Shuber, Jordan)
November 22, 2019 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Shuber, Jordan)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 11/19/2019, Rule 26 Meeting Report and Stipulation Selecting ADR Process due by 11/26/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/3/2019 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 9B before Judge William S. Stickman. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 10/21/19. (eca)
October 21, 2019 Filing 7 Defendant's Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to #1 Complaint by PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES. (Shuber, Jordan) Modified text on 10/21/2019 to link to correct document. (jm)
October 17, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by VIVIAN N. DAVIS. (Kobylinski, David)
October 15, 2019 Filing 5 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES. (Shuber, Jordan)
October 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF COURT. By October 29, 2019, each party must execute and file the judge election form available at https://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Consent-to-Mag.pdf. Through that filing, each party must either consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge or select the option to continue to proceed before a United States District Judge. If all parties consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge, the matter will be referred to the Clerk of Court for reassignment. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 10/15/19. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca)
October 15, 2019 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES. (King, Thomas)
October 15, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas W. King, III on behalf of PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES. (King, Thomas)
October 14, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-19-012776 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-5319317), filed by PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F) (jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DAVIS v. PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES
Represented By: Jordan P. Shuber
Represented By: Thomas W. King, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VIVIAN N. DAVIS
Represented By: Peter T. Kobylinski
Represented By: David M. Kobylinski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?